. the newest punchline is that the standard prominent constraint for women possess come not the risk of searching for too low quality from a spouse, but rather the risk of not settling for a sufficient partner plus in this ending up by yourself. \n
So by holding out longer and doing lots of online comparison shopping, all women can now obtain mates who are above average? What is this — the Lake Wobegon theory of female choice? \n”,”children”:[<"id":160005314,"author":"Anon","vote_total":1,"user_vote":null,"updoots":1,"downboops":0,"vote_count":1,"date":"2019-11-16>
Yes, most women can obtain mates that are above average. It’s called polygyny. We already have a soft, informal version of this. A minority of men have a disproportionate number of serial marriages, relationships, and flings with women. But because of cultural inertia and a sense of shame, we pretend that this polygyny doesn’t exist and refuse to acknowledge that it’s based on women’s preference to share an above average man over exclusive access to a loser. \n”,”children”:[<"id":160006165,"author":"Jonfraz","vote_total":0,"user_vote":null,"updoots":0,"downboops":0,"vote_count":0,"date":"2019-11-19>
Most young women. And even then, for many, only in the short term (research shows that when it comes to flings, one-night-stands, etc, men are less choosy and women moreso than when looking for a long-term mate). But the risk for women of making a series of ‘good’ short-term deals when young is that they’ll end up with a worse deal (or no deal at all) when they’re no longer so young. \n”>,<"id":160005317,"author":"Constantine","vote_total":0,"user_vote":null,"updoots":0,"downboops":0,"vote_count":0,"date":"2019-11-16>